2006/2007

Metamorphoses

Resurrection, Taxonomies and Transformative Practices in Early Christianity

Humanities

Principal investigators

Turid Karlsen Seim

Professor
University of Oslo (UiO)
Year at CAS

Abstract

The project aimed at exploring how ideas and experiences of transformation were expressed in Early Christianity. It assumed new patterns of interpreting Pre-Constantinian Christianity not so much in uniform and evolutionary terms but as a diversity of groups and beliefs. Despite a claim to exclusiveness and experiences of conflict and persecution, the early Christians depended upon and actively exploited existing forms of thought, speech and behaviour. They yielded to given discourses while slowly establishing new ones. What were the frameworks within which transformative ideas such as resurrection and also experiences of having become "a new being" were shaped; the analogies to which they referred; and the parameters by which transformation was being noted and actually asserted? How was Christianity conceived and received by people not already culturally and religiously informed or shaped by it?
The focus on transformation helped connect areas of research that so far have been studied separately, and the project covered the following main areas:
1. Transformation and Taxonomy – a study of how various constructions of cosmological order accommodated or challenged transformative movements. We explored the interplay between spatial and temporal categories; the terms used to express differences and likenesses between terrestrial and celestial realms; and the role these terms served as boundary-markers.
2. Resurrection, Recognition and the Resurrected Body. A comprehensive and nuanced reading of a variety of Greco-Roman, Jewish and Christian sources affirmed that faith in resurrection was a hallmark of Christian identity but that the way in which resurrection and the resurrected body was perceived and explained varied greatly but yet had – also in the case of Jesus - an emphasis on transformative change and polymorphism/multiformity rather than on the solid bodily continuity that gained ground in later Christian doctrine in the West.
3. Resurrection Rehearsed. The focus was on asceticism as transformative practice -including transformation as designed by a hierarchical configuration of gender; martyrdom and the ascetic agon as transformation, and the idea that likeness to the angels might be attained and life in paradise rehearsed already before death. By Jesus’ resurrection death was rendered invisible as one always looked past and beyond it. The capacity to see what is spiritually true already in this life of the flesh and past the flesh was cultivated. Yet flesh and sense perception continued to be observed as the visible surface on which, with proper vision, one could discern the state of the invisible, spiritual interior.
4. The Generation of a Third Race: The focus was on transformation through conversion into a new social order. In antiquity human agency was conceptualized not so much in terms of individual, autonomous freedom, but in terms of “instrumental agency” to spiritual forces both good and evil. In this area especially the pedagogies and practices regarded as necessary for ongoing development and change were studied. Since exorcism, baptism, and chrism were important as practices that signified and performed transformation, this will be further pursued in a follow-up workshop May 2008 on Rituals of Transformation.

The group worked extensively and collectively with primary sources in Greek, Coptic, Syriac, Hebrew, and Latin and a diversity of Christian sources was interpreted in a comparative interplay with Jewish and Greco-Roman texts. The project did not assume an overarching theoretical model beyond the line of approach indicated above. Each participant had the freedom to contribute from his or her own position and field of expertise, and this created not tensions but a multifaceted ongoing exchange that proved itself fruitful for the outcome of the project

Fellows

Denise Kimber Buell

Professor
Williams College
Year at CAS

Adela Yarbro Collins

Professor
Yale University
Year at CAS

John J. Collins

Professor
Yale University
Year at CAS
profile image illustration

István Czachesz

Research Fellow
University of Groningen
Year at CAS
profile image illustration

Troels Engberg-Pedersen

Professor
University of Copenhagen
Year at CAS

Karen Leigh King

Professor
Harvard University
Year at CAS

Outi Lehtipuu

Lecturer
University of Helsinki
Year at CAS

Liv Ingeborg Lied

Professor
Norwegian School of Theology, Religion and Society (MF)
Year at CAS

Hugo Lundhaug

Professor
University of Oslo (UiO)
Year at CAS

Antti Sakari Marjanen

Dr.
University of Helsinki
Year at CAS

Samuel Rubenson

Professor
Lund University
Year at CAS

Vigdis Songe-Møller

Professor
University of Bergen (UiB)
Year at CAS

Einar Thomassen

Professor
University of Bergen (UiB)
Year at CAS

Jorunn Økland

Professor
University of Bergen (UiB)
Year at CAS